How to Make a Review of a Diploma: Step-by-Step Instructions

messi62

A review of your final qualifying work is a mandatory document that must be submitted before the defense. This is a specialist's response to your research, which should not be confused with a review from your supervisor. The review is written by a professional in the field you are studying for, he is an active worker and knows absolutely everything about the craft. But the supervisor's review is his professional opinion on how well or poorly you have studied the issue from an academic point of view and whether you are worthy of receiving the proud title of "graduate of a higher educational institution." Both documents are important and you should have them ready. But if it is quite easy to get an assessment from a scientist, you just need to go to the department and get a piece of paper, then finding a sensible reviewer is a task with an asterisk.



02 Who should write a review of a student's final qualifying work?
what kind of pokemon is thisWe said that the review is written by an expert in the field you have chosen. But who is this anyway? How do you know that he is a professional? Will any of them be suitable? Let's figure it out.

Indeed, this is the person who is currently mobile app development service performing the activity in the position for which you are being prepared at the university. Study to be a teacher - take a review from a teacher, study to be an artist - from a professional master of painting, study to be a journalist - from a journalist, study to be a psychologist - from an experienced healer of human souls, and so on.

There are a lot of such people in your city. You may already know some of them personally, thanks to industrial or educational practice, work experience in the specialty. For this purpose, universities send students to practical classes so that you can immerse yourself in the craft and meet people, find useful contacts. All this can help when searching for a reviewer and further employment. The logic is simple: did the practice - you have experience, did not - look for places where to get a review.




If you find it difficult to find a person for such free work, you can always ask teachers for help and look at them from a different angle. In the first case, a compassionate teacher can give you a contact of a friend who has been working in the profession for a long time and can help you. In the second case, it is not uncommon for the teachers themselves to be parallel workers. That is, they work in two positions. And of course, it was nice not to go far and, for a big thank you, ask him for a review.

how to choose a reviewer for a diploma

The only problem is that you wouldn't want to take a review from just anyone. You can take the path of least resistance, fish out a kind, junior specialist in a low position for a chocolate bar and ask for help. This would also be a fair option. But you would still want to get a cool response for yourself and brag about it to the committee, the researcher and your classmates. Moreover, the people evaluating your final qualifying work will definitely look at who gave the review. And the logic here is obvious: if it was written by a super-master, you get a good mark, if it was written by an unknown person, you will have to think and choose. Of course, this rule does not work absolutely correctly. They may not even look at who wrote what to you. But it is better to be prepared for everything.

And here's another point. This is not necessarily observed, but it is still preferable when the review is written not just by a professional, but also by a person specializing in the topic of the final qualifying work. That is, if you are writing a diploma on child psychology, then the reviewer should be a specialist in treating children. If you are writing about the development of tourism in St. Petersburg, it would be nice to enlist the support of a government official in this field or at least a guide. Again, this is not necessary, but it would be very cool.